|
 |
�뿕由ы듃 留덉씤�뱶 |
|
| 저자 | �뒪�깲 鍮꾩꺼(�뿭:李⑤갚留�) |
| 출판사 | 鍮꾩쫰�럹�씠�띁 |
|
 |
�븳諛ㅼ쨷�쓽 �떖由ы븰 �닔�뾽 |
|
| 저자 | �솴�뼇諛�(�뿭:�씠�쁺二�) |
| 출판사 | 誘몃뵒�뼱�댉 |
|
 |
�떆�옣�쓣 吏�諛고븯�뒗 留덉���똿 泥좏븰�쓽 踰뺤튃 |
|
| 저자 | 源�湲곗갔쨌 李⑦쁽二� |
| 출판사 | 媛��궛異쒗뙋�궗 |
|
 |
寃쎌젣�쟻 �븞�젙�쓣 �쐞�븳 Y�꽭����쓽 遺꾪닾 G |
|
| 洹쒕え媛� �옉��� X�꽭������ 鍮꾧탳�빐蹂대㈃, 1982�뀈遺��꽣 2000�뀈 �궗�씠�뿉 �깭�뼱�궃 7泥쒕쭔 紐낆쓽 諛��젅�땲�뼹 �꽭����뒗 寃쎌젣�쟻 蹂듦텒�뿉 �떦泥⑤릺吏� 紐삵븳 寃껋쿂�읆 蹂댁씤�떎. �씠�뱾 �꽭����뒗 �떣而� 遺뺢눼, 911 �뀒�윭怨듦꺽, 二쇳깮媛�寃� �룺�씫, 2008�뀈 湲덉쑖怨듯솴, 洹몃━怨� ���移⑥껜瑜� 紐⑷꺽�뻽�떎. 洹몃젃�떎硫� 洹몃뱾�쓽 �룄�쟾怨쇱젣�뒗 臾댁뾿�씪源�? �뼱�뼸寃� ���泥섑븷 寃껋씤媛�? |
|
|
 |
The Patent Epidemic |
|
| Back in 2001, something strange happened in the world of patent law. Microsoft, which had been fighting a lawsuit by Priceline, suddenly gave up. The suit, filed in late 1999, claimed that Priceline had patented its ��쐍ame your own price��� auction strategy, and that no one else could use it without a license from the company. Microsoft had been using a similar strategy on its Expedia travel site and had been arguing in U.S. District Court in Connecticut that the auction method was too obvious to be patented. |
|
|
[193]권 
